Clash of Civilization Article

Clash of Civilization

Ernest Hemingway stated that, " In modern battle … you will die just like a dog pertaining to no good reason”! Even though that is certainly true, authorities have gone further by attempting to find the " roots” and explain so why conflicts arise in the first place. Two experts, Samuel P. Huntington and Ruben R. Bowen, present two different approaches towards the reason behind conflicts in 21st century. Although there is a difference between their methods, both of them reveal the common believe a conflict may happen when one puts pressure on the other; but the reason why this kind of pressure takes place, varies among the list of two ideas. In his document, " The Clash of Civilizations”, Huntington points out that in the 21st century, clashes will not occur based on ideology of a condition or civilization, neither on economic electricity; but they will be held at because the differences in cultural and religious id between civilizations. As the first key point that is situated under this theory, is a Western world approach towards the Eastern world. According to him, the Western World promotes their very own " politics and economical values, preserve their predominance and guard their interest” through economical and politics pressure via Western Organization such as ESTE and IMF. This European approach boosts the cultural split between European and Eastern civilization, nevertheless also within Western World; between Traditional western Christianity and Orthodox Christianity. This approach may be easily understandable if we check out the famous events wherever Western and Eastern civilization confronted the other person such as in the Gulf Conflict and Bosnian war, wherever Western applied their capacity to protect countries from a same tradition, same civilization. This leads to a reaction from Asian countries or maybe the countries together with the same civilization, with the patients such as Muslims vis-à-vis Bosnian Muslims. With regards to this case, in respect to Huntington, the Western are accused by the East for twice standard, " one standard to their kin-countries and a different standard to others” (373).

The second key point that Huntington makes, is that the over-pressure of any Western towards non-Western makes allies among different civilizations on the Asian civilization. When he stated, " the work line is not always sharp”, hence civilizations may move through a social meltdown and states may possibly overpass all their traditional and religion values. But this kind of overlap makes even deeper division inside the foreign affairs where there are merely two edges: The American and the Rest. This was evidently evident with Arabian countries in the post Gulf Battle period, after they switched factors and designed a Western policy against Sadam, who preferred an Anti-Western insurance plan. Moreover, the obstacles which might be created by Western towards non-Western, delivers the non-Western civilization to a cross-road, wherever they either join the Western civilization, or produce alliances amongst other non-Western, thus " competing together with the West simply by developing their own economic, military and political power” (376). For example , although Japan is definitely consider as an Asian civilization, having a geographic placement near the Communist country – China, and feared from the Communist pressure - effect that may occurred within Asia, managed to " establish a one of a kind position to get itself because an associate part of the West”, (376). On the other hand, Western civilization enforces Intercontinental Laws and Conventions on the non-Western countries, so that they will accept the Western values. However , the non-Western countries disobey those values and started co-operation beyond their particular culture, religion and politics view. While Huntington remarks, " the Confucian-Islamic connection” that occurred in the Eastern civilization, is actually a cooperation among non-Western countries for their internal development, therefore " challenging the American interests, ideals and power” (376). Issues between individuals countries may occur, but is less prone to expand into...